Review Process

By submitting a paper to ICMCE, the authors agree to the review process and understand that papers undergo a peer-review process. Manuscripts will be reviewed by appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Conference Committee, who will give detailed comments and — if the submission gets accepted — the authors submit a revised ("camera-ready") version that takes into account this feedback.

All papers are reviewed using a single-blind review process: authors declare their names and affiliations in the manuscript for the reviewers to see, but reviewers do not know each other's identities, nor do the authors receive information about who has reviewed their manuscript. The Committees of ICMCE invest great efforts in reviewing the papers submitted to the conference and organising the sessions to enable the participants to gain maximum benefit.

Dual/Double Submissions

By submitting a manuscript to ICMCE, authors acknowledge that it has not been previously published or accepted for publication in substantially similar form in any peer-reviewed venue including journal, conference, workshop, or archival forums. Furthermore, no paper substantially similar in content has been or will be submitted to another conference or workshop during the review period. The authors also attest that they did not submit substantially similar submissions to ICMCE. Violation of any of these conditions will lead to rejection.

The goals of the dual submission policy:
(i) to have exciting new work be published for the first time at ICMCE.
(ii) to avoid duplicating the effort of reviewers.